Earlier this week, United to End Genocide joined American Jewish World Service, Enough Project, Jewish World Watch, Humanity United, The Institute on Religion and Public Policy, and Investors Against Genocide in urging members of the United States Senate to fully support international affairs funding. The letter focused on the current challenges facing Sudan and the need to ensure adequate resources are available for humanitarian aid, development assistance, economic support, and peacekeeping funding. (more…)
Posts Tagged Peacekeeping
Organizations Urge Full Funding to Save Lives and Support Peace in Sudan
Wednesday, November 9th, 2011
The New UN Peacekeeping Mission for South Sudan
Monday, July 11th, 2011On Friday, the United Nations Security Council unanimously approved a resolution for a new peacekeeping mission to replace the current UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) whose mandate expired on Saturday when South Sudan officially became an independent country and split from the North. The mandate for the United Nations Mission in the Republic of South Sudan (UNMISS) establishes the mission for one initial year, with the intention for further renewal.
The Security Council authorized the deployment of up to 7,000 troops, which is an improvement from the previous mission which had 5,000 troops in the South. In a country the size of Texas with less than 50 miles of paved roads, the additional 2000 troops are essential in order to effectively have a decentralized mission that is able to protect civilians and not just United Nations infrastructure. After the mission’s initial three and six months, the Security Council will review the conditions on the ground to determine if the troop levels can be reduced to 6,000. The added clause was likely included to appease members of the Security Council who initially objected to the additional troops due to UN budget concerns. The UNMISS personnel will also include 900 police as well as UN civilian staff including human rights experts.
In May, Ban Ki-moon, the Secretary General of the UN, issued a report with recommendations for the new UNMISS mission. Two major aspects of the suggested mandate that were missing in Ban Ki-moon’s report were a full Chapter VII mandate which authorizes the use of force by peacekeepers in order to protect civilians, and any mention of responding to attacks by the Lords Resistance Army (LRA) who continue to terrorize civilians throughout Central Africa, including South Sudan. While the previous UNMIS mission had a mandate to protect civilians which would technically encompass responding to LRA attacks, UNMIS failed to take effective action to counter LRA attacks.
In June, the Save Darfur Coalition/Genocide Intervention Network sent a letter to U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice urging her to utilize her influence at the Security Council to ensure that the new UNMISS mission was equipped with a robust Chapter VII mandate that had specific language directing the new mission to respond to LRA attacks in South Sudan, both of which were included in the final version of the UNMISS mandate that was passed last week.
Since the Government of Sudan has refused to allow the mission to continue in the North, the new mission will operate solely in the South, leaving a critical gap along the contentious border region where fighting has displaced over 188,000 civilians in the past two months. While the Security Council has authorized the United Nations Interim Security Force for Abyei (UNISFA), the state of South Kordofan, where fighting between the Sudanese government and the Sudan Peoples Liberation Army-North has persisted now for over a month, will have no peacekeeper presence. The absence of a peacekeeping force in South Kordofan and its neighboring state Blue Nile, could have disastrous consequences for civilians.
Headlines from Sudan – April 7th
Thursday, April 7th, 2011Here is the daily roundup and summary of the major headlines coming out of Sudan. SDC/GI-NET does not necessarily support the views of articles posted to this site.
Darfur States renege on agreement with ‘voluntary returnees’ Radio Dabanga
- The Ministries of Humanitarian Affairs in the provinces of South and West Darfur have reneged on commitments to provide services and means of production to returnees from Kalma Camp. The services were promised as part of a ‘voluntary repatriation’ framework agreed upon three months ago by the government and the returnees. The ministries were to provide shelter, education and health services, water, livestock, grain mills, and water generators.
UNAMID MOURNS FALLEN PEACEKEEPERS UNAMID
UNAMID pays tribute to falllen peacekeepers (courtesy of UNMIS)
- UNAMID today paid respects to the memory of a female police advisor who died in an ambush yesterday afternoon in Kutum, North Darfur. The tribute was part of a larger remembrance ceremony as flags of the African Union and United Nations stood at half-mast in honor of more than 40 individuals who lost their lives recently in peacekeeping missions worldwide.
UNMIS commemorates fallen peacekeepers UNMIS
- On Wednesday, UNMIS and UN offices across the world remembered peacekeepers who recently died while serving in Afghanistan, Haiti, Cote d’Ivoire and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). “It has been the heaviest toll that I know of in the last week,” Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary-General Jasbir Lidder said in Khartoum. Last Thursday, in Cote d’Ivoire, a UN volunteer was fatally struck by a stray bullet, while in Haiti a UN police officer was killed in a hit-and-run accident. On Friday, three UN staff and four Nepalese security personnel protecting them were brutally killed in Afghanistan. On Monday, a UN plane crashed in the DRC, killing 32 out of 33 people on board. Yesterday, in Darfur, a peacekeeper was killed in an ambush.
US asks SLM-MM to join Doha talks on Darfur Radio Dabanga
- Dane Smith, U.S. Senior Advisor on Darfur, asked the Sudanese Liberation Movement-Minni Manawi (SLM-MM) to join the ongoing Darfur peace negotiations in Doha. Minni Arko Minawi, the rebel leader, has said that his pre-conditions for joining the peace talks are: the presence of an independent mediator accepted by the parties; a neutral platform for negotiation with international observation; and the declaration of new principles with the participation of all the armed movements in Darfur.
Darfur rebel leader condemns killing of UNAMID peacekeeper Sudan Tribune
- The Sudanese Liberation Movement-Abdul Wahid (SLM-AW) condemned today the killing of a female peacekeeper in Darfur and accused militias backed by Khartoum of being behind the attack. Abdel Wahid Al-Nur, the leader of the SLM faction, said that Sudanese authorities bear the responsibility of this aggression, adding that “Khartoum arm, pay and protect them to be part of the terror policy implemented in the region”.
Sudan confiscates copies of pro-opposition daily Sudan Tribune
-
Fayiz Al-Silayik, Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Ajrass al-Hurriya (courtesy of Sudan Tribune)
Copies of a North Sudanese newspaper, Ajrass al-Hurriya, which is affiliated with South Sudan’s ruling Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) party, were confiscated in Khartoum on Wednesday by the country’s security forces. Sudan has repeatedly preempted coverage of newspapers through the use of confiscation and a pre-publication censorship system, whereby security agents visit offices of newspapers at night to screen draft copies and expunge contents deemed detrimental to the government’s reputation.
CPA parties fail to agree on extension for UNMIS Al-Sahafa
- The joint security committee of the parties to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) concluded its meetings in Addis Ababa on Tuesday, failing to reach an agreement on an extension for UNMIS and the status of soldiers in the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) hailing from southern Kordofan and the Blue Nile dates. While the SPLM insisted that the UNMIS mandate be extended for a year, the National Congress Party (NCP) refused to consider any extension for UNMIS troops after the end of the interim period.
Save Darfur Letter to the UN Security Council on Rising Insecurity in Darfur
Thursday, May 20th, 2010
A Soldier Serving with Darfur's Beleaguered Protection Force (Photo: AFP/Getty)
Security in Darfur continues to deteriorate, as evidenced by reports of intense fighting over the weekend and the armed kidnapping of three aid workers on Tuesday. Amid a faltering ceasefire, deadly attacks against peacekeepers, violence in Jebel Marra, and troubling news of a military build-up, the Save Darfur Coalition has written to the Permanent Representative of Lebanon to the United Nations – this month’s president of the Security Council – to address the escalating crisis and its impact on the lives and livelihoods of Darfuri civilians. Today, the UNSC is due to discuss UNAMID in a briefing this morning and consultations in the afternoon.
The text of the letter is below, and can also downloaded it as a PDF.
May 17, 2010
H.E. Dr. Nawaf Salam
Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary
Permanent Representative of Lebanon
to the United Nations in New York
866 UN Plaza Suite 531-33
New York, NY 10017Via Facsimile: +1 212 838 2819
Your Excellency Dr. Salam:
We are writing to you on behalf of more than 190 faith-based, advocacy and human rights organizations that make up the Save Darfur Coalition on the occasion of your term as president of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to urge that you make the increasing security concerns in Darfur a top priority during the month of May.
We appreciate your recent reflection that this month presents Lebanon with the opportunity to enhance its global image, in part through assuming a key role on issues relating to Sudan. We also believe that the leadership of Lebanon can deliver renewed international attention and political momentum toward addressing the crucial challenges that face Sudan and its tumultuous region of Darfur, where hostilities have recently escalated. The Save Darfur Coalition is gravely concerned about current insecurity in Darfur, particularly with regard to the situation in the central region of Jebel Marra and a faltering ceasefire between a leading rebel movement and the Sudanese government. Just this past weekend, fierce clashes are reported to have taken place in Jebel Moon, with potentially serious implications for the plight of local civilians, border security with neighboring Chad, and prospects for peace talks scheduled to resume this week. These developments – in addition to small arms proliferation and an increase in tribal conflict – pose a significant threat to the lives and livelihoods of thousands of civilians.
Preparing for MINURCAT’s Departure (Continued)
Thursday, May 6th, 2010Cross-posted at Physician for Human Rights. Click here to see the first part of this blog, posted last week.
Contrary to the agreement of UN and Chadian officials that the United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT) has “served its purpose,” the BBC reported news of clashes between the Popular Front for National Resistance (FPRN) and Chadian security forces over the weekend. Unofficial reports from the area reference heavy losses of both troops and vehicles sustained by the Government of Chad (GoC) — raising concerns about the possibilities for continuation of humanitarian operations in the area.
The Secretary-General’s speech yesterday continued to maintain that improved relations between Chad and Sudan would allow for a significant reduction of military troops in the volatile Eastern Chad border region; the speech did not respond directly to concerns from human rights groups regarding the financial and logistical components of the new security arrangement. More than 200,000 Darfuri refugees are dependent upon humanitarian operations by international and domestic NGOs for food, shelter, and medical care in the region.
Outlining the proposals advocated in his report, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon recommended the MINURCAT mission’s military component in Chad now be reduced from 3,300 troops to 1,400 troops. In context, the remaining military troops would represent only 38 percent of the troops initially authorized by the UN as necessary to securing the displaced refugee population and humanitarian operations in Eastern Chad. (Even before this withdrawal, the MINURCAT deployment never approached its full authorized deployment of 4,900).
As noted previously, over the past year the region has remained among the most hazardous operating environments currently sustaining humanitarian operations. The disruption of humanitarian operations this weekend was not the first such occurrence. Multi-week suspensions of operations by agencies such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the World Food Programme (WFP) in November-December and May 2009.
Without sufficient security in the area, NGOs are unable to provide services ranging from food distribution — a particular concern ahead of the rainy season; water and sanitation projects — vital to control the spread of disease among overcrowded and vulnerable refugee populations; and medical services, including mobile clinics serving rural populations.
The continued absence of a military capable of securing the area and deterring further attacks could threaten not only the refugee community, but the ability of the humanitarian NGOs to continue to operate in the area.
In addition to these concerns, the recommendations of the Secretary-General’s report increase the informal role of the Détachement intégré de sécurité (DIS) — formed to provide security in the refugee camps and surrounding areas but increasingly relied upon to provide escorts to many UN agencies and some NGO convoys. The under-deployment of the MINURCAT military component, and its lack of troop-strength capable of providing military escorts, increased the role of the DIS (UN-trained Chadian police); this has diverted the focus of the force away from providing security to camp residents, including protection to women gathering firewood and animal feed and to those travelling to market of farming areas.
Along with replacing the lost 1,400 MINURCAT troops — the Government of Chad must also scale up the capacity of the Gendarmerie Nationale national police force of Chad in order to take over the security escorts required by humanitarians — a challenge considering the lower levels of operational and human rights training provided to this force.
Human Rights groups urged the Secretary-General to consider the security of NGO operations, as well as the need for consultation and transparency with refugee communities and humanitarian agencies on the ground. It is vital that the final recommendations, to be adopted by the UN Security Council later this month, are revised to include these concerns.
In sum, the Secretary-General’s recommendations advocate for the withdrawal of 1,400 troops by 15 July (leaving only 1,900 international troops in Chad until 15 October 2010, when they are planned to cease all operations and commence their final withdrawal), while the Government of Chad must source the necessary financial and logistical resources to secure a volatile region hosting in excess of 200,000 Darfurian refugees, whilst sustaining renewed attacks from militia groups possibly associated with the Government of Sudan.
Preparing for MINURCAT’s Departure: the Post-Peacekeeping Reality in Eastern Chad
Friday, April 30th, 2010Next week, the UN Secretary-General’s report on the future of the United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT) peacekeeping force in Eastern Chad will be released, outlining the withdrawal of peacekeeping troops in the Chad-Sudan border region visited by PHR researchers in 2008. The report Nowhere to Turn: Failure to Protect, Support and Assure Justice for Darfuri Women, released by PHR in June 2009, outlined urgent human rights issues in Eastern Chad, including food insecurity, camp infrastructure, access to health and psychosocial care, and security for refugee families. Among the disturbing findings of our investigation was a 50% rate of rape or sexual assault reported by women interviewed by the PHR medical team.
Since the time of PHR’s investigation, a number of security threats and human rights issues have been recorded — via international media reporting on hijackings and kidnappings of humanitarian aid workers, and reports such as that released by the Institute of Studies on Conflicts and Humanitarian Action (IECAH) on the continued need for the peacekeeping force.
Many large-scale infrastructure issues remain, such as the weak Chadian legal system, drought and food shortage, and the continued operation of militarized rebel groups in the area, as well as auxiliary practical issues such as low phone coverage (a key issue for reducing attacks against refugees and humanitarians, as emergency phone calls allow for MINURCAT forces to be alerted to security problems). The recent dispute over the continued presence of the MINURCAT force has detracted focus from these problems, which need to remain at the forefront of the diplomatic and humanitarian agenda in Chad. (Despite ongoing needs in Eastern Chad, the Chadian Government opposed the MINURCAT mission’s renewal in January 2010.)
The withdrawal of MINURCAT transfers responsibility for the security of refugees and humanitarian operations to the Government of Chad (GoC) — a significant challenge for a state with low material wealth and incomplete infrastructure. So, what can be done, given the limitations of the current circumstances?
First, it is important to remember that the continued existence of the 200,000 Darfurian refugees in Eastern Chad relies on the efforts of humanitarian aid workers and UN staff on the ground: managing the refugee camps, distributing WFP rations and shelter items, and providing emergency medical care. Humanitarian agencies have continued to operate in Eastern Chad despite increasingly frequent security threats to NGOs and personnel, and rely on police escorts in order to operate in the Phase IV security environment. The current system of police escorts for NGO convoys must be taken over by the Chadian police force, and it is particularly important that NGOs are not obliged to pay or provide other compensation for the new security arrangements, and that the GoC accept responsibility for ensuring the security of the humanitarian operations.
Secondly, refugee communities and the humanitarian actors working with refugees must be consulted and kept informed of the transition and departure of MINURCAT and how the GoC will continue MINURCAT’s security and protection activities. In order to ensure this takes place, the GoC should immediately establish a dialogue and consultation forum with refugee communities and humanitarian workers, and the international community should remain engaged in the transition process to ensure that this takes place.
Thirdly, it is of utmost importance that the MINURCAT withdrawal not be allowed to disrupt the humanitarian operations in Eastern Chad and/or detract from refugee security and protection. The continued monitoring of the human rights situation on the ground, and a specific focus on the security and protection needs of refugees, is paramount. The numbers of the civilian police force should be increased as the military component is phased out, and measures must be taken in the recruiting process to improve the conduct of police officers, sensitize police to human rights and gender issues, and dramatically raise the number of women police officers.
The disappointing withdrawal of the MINURCAT force — before the benchmarks of withdrawal have been met (see the Secretary-General’s December 2008 reports) — should not distract the UN Security Council or the international community from addressing the ongoing problems affecting the Darfurian refugee population in Eastern Chad. The reduction of arms, sexual and gender-based violence and human rights abuses (demilitarization of camps) must remain a key priority, along with assisting the voluntary and safe return of communities. In addition to resolving security issues on a community level, it is vital that widespread problems, such as the capacity and training of national law enforcement agencies, judiciary and prison systems, are addressed, and that the Chadian military assigns a quick reaction force to take over from MINURCAT’s civilian component.
Peacekeepers Abducted in Darfur
Friday, April 16th, 2010
UNAMID peacekeepers on patrol in Regel El-Kubri, Sudan (UN Photo/Stuart Price)
Most Sudan-related news this week has understandably focused on the country’s historic elections, which came to a close yesterday after a generally peaceful but deeply flawed process. Many journalists documented electoral irregularities, the opposition boycott, and even a few incidents of violence and intimidation. In Darfur – which EU observers declared too insecure for monitoring – another story has gone largely under the radar of the international press.
Just as the nationwide polls were underway, four South African peacekeepers went missing in near Nyala, in South Darfur. On Tuesday—the third day of voting—the joint United Nations African-Union mission (UNAMID) confirmed their abduction at gunpoint.
The kidnappers are allegedly part of a new militia in the region, which calls itself the People’s Democratic Struggle Movement. Jubril Bukhari Abbas, the group’s head, is reported to have acknowledged its members were responsible, but were not acting under the movement’s instructions.
He reportedly said the abductor “was unaware of an agreement which was concluded between the government and [the movement], which has joined the peace march.”
UNAMID spokesman Nouredine Mezni said mission representatives have spoken with the kidnapped peacekeepers, and they are in good health.
Although Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir has declared the war over, impunity and insecurity persist in the form of both direct clashes and unrestrained lawlessness. Recent fighting in Jebel Marra and in Jebel Moon has resulted in up to 400 deaths and has displaced an estimated 100,000 civilians, leaving the local populations without access to humanitarian assistance or military protection.
Darfur’s peacekeepers and aid workers have been increasingly targeted, resulting in kidnapping, banditry, and even killings. This week’s incident is only the latest of many that highlight how the “calm but unpredictable” security environment in Darfur in reality means it is safe for no one, least of all those trying to alleviate the crisis.
It is little wonder, then, why the more than two million displaced people in camps and members of other war-affected communities generally boycotted the registration process in this year’s elections. Opposition politics remains a dangerous and nearly impossible pursuit in Darfur. Intimidation prevails, and the region remains under a state of emergency. There is no evidence that any of the various armed groups have Darfuri interests in mind as they try to gain leverage amid faltering ceasefires and ongoing peace talks, and the election results will no doubt have implications for their tactics.
Even if one accepts Bashir’s declaration that the war in Darfur is over, the brutal consequences of the crisis on a daily basis confront the vast majority of its citizens. Without the opportunity to choose leadership other than Bashir and his ruling party, Darfuris were understandably hesitant to take any part in a sham that seeks to legitimize a regime that has directly contributed to their ongoing grievances.
Gunships Can’t Save Darfur Alone
Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010
Newly deployed M-35P in Nyala. Photo: UNAMID/Albert Gonzalez Farran
It’s been a painfully long time coming, but last week, five Mil Mi-35P gunships settled in to their new home in Nyala, South Darfur. The Ethiopian helicopters – whitewashed for peacekeeping service – will in theory greatly enhance UNAMID’s aerial capacity. They represent a key force multiplier, essential in developing the mission’s rapid reaction capability, including emergency response and tactical intervention.
But after celebrating their long overdue arrival, the first thing on Force Commander Nyamvumba’s agenda was to ask for more. He has made it very clear that this is only one step in a series of many that UN and AU member states must take to provide his peacekeepers with the very best odds possible as they confront endless challenges in Darfur, an advantage they have not thus far enjoyed.
This means giving them the mobility and muscle needed to successfully confront hostile operating conditions, the adversities of which have been compounded by continued obstruction by both the government and rebel groups, as well as by violent attacks directly targeting the mission and its assets.
Amid reports of civilian deaths and mass displacement, recent events illustrate the complex reality of a place far from peace. The use of indiscriminate aerial bombardment by the Sudan Armed Forces against rebel positions in Jebel Moun and Jebel Mara has a disproportionately devastating effect on local populations. Rebel movements have likewise hurt Darfuri civilians by restricting both UNAMID investigations and humanitarian access. In at least one battle – which resulted in more than a dozen deaths, 31,000 displaced civilians, and serious human rights abuses, including sexual violence – highly placed military sources told me that “helicopters and aerial reconnaissance units would have helped…prevent the incident.”
In fact, over the last three months, fatal incidents have repeatedly highlighted the essential role of helicopters in life-saving medical evacuation, rapid investigations and assessment following clashes, tactical intervention and quick reaction capacity, aerial reconnaissance and monitoring, as well as troop and equipment deployment. The Mi-35P is only capable of fulfilling a small number of these tasks.
The Mi-35Ps – with their powerful 30-mm twin-barrel automatic cannons – bring exciting new strength to an operation consistently criticized for being weak and ineffective, but they are in reality only a few items on a long list of aircraft that UNAMID desperately needs to implement its protection mandate. The gunships, while important, have limited impact on the mission’s ability to negotiate Darfur’s harsh terrain, rampant banditry, and prohibitive lack of infrastructure necessary for the efficient movement of troops and equipment to the region’s hotspots. For that, UNAMID requires many more utility and transport helicopters.
UNAMID Under Attack
Thursday, December 10th, 2009
The UN-AU hybrid operation in Darfur has been called many things, from being described as a pawn or a proxy to being dismissed as incompetent or irrelevant. But the truth is almost always ignored: these peacekeepers are quite literally the only force standing between a vulnerable, victimized population and criminally rampant insecurity. Each and every soldier risks his or her own safety to be there, in the line of fire, protecting Darfuri civilians. On December 4th and 5th, five Rwandans gave up their lives as part of that important effort. What’s more, all reports indicate that rather than resort to reckless, desperate measures to save only themselves when under attack, the soldiers returned fire with due restraint, thereby ensuring the security of nearby civilians, and fighting for their protection until the very end.
Someone has to be held to account for these attacks. Sudanese authorities, responding to Rwandan accusations, have denied involvement and suggested these deaths were inflicted by subversive attempts to sabotage the peace and stability that Darfur “enjoys”. North Darfur Governor Osman Mohamed Yousef Kibir has dismissed the incident as ‘isolated’ and deflected blame to common criminals. He says it was banditry, claiming the peacekeepers were killed by looters for a vehicle.
Make no mistake; these peacekeepers – and the 17 others who have been killed in action since the beginning of 2008 – did not loose their lives simply because of a vehicle. They were not defeated by petty thieves. It is becoming increasingly obvious that the Government of Sudan and its auxiliary forces have created an environment that works against UNAMID and places its troops in daily danger – as evidenced by the three attacks this week, including two lethal ones in as many days.
Regardless of whether one buys into rumors that the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and their allies SLA/MM are trying to scare UNAMID away, or that Darfuri rebel groups are trying to prove they have yet to be defeated, one cannot ignore the reality that the absence of compliance by the Government of Sudan does not mean it can escape some responsibility for the events.
Consider two points. First, according to the United Nations, “no UNAMID movement is permitted without approval by the Government of the Sudan.” Therefore, in the case of both deadly attacks, the SAF or other Government authorities would have been aware of UNAMID’s activities. Additionally, one location, Saraf Omra, is a government “stronghold” where, according to the Rwandan Armed Forces spokesperson, there was no known rebel activity. UNAMID’s Rwandan platoon was escorting a water tanker a mere 300 metres from Sudan government forces when they were ambushed.
At best, this makes the Sudanese Government – which maintains primary responsibility for security in the region – negligent and incompetent; more realistically, it means UNAMID’s troops are the latest victims of the ongoing violence in Darfur that is either sanctioned, facilitated, or directly perpetrated by Khartoum.
UNAMID in the Dark
Tuesday, December 1st, 2009Three months ago, the outgoing force commander of UNAMID said there is no war in Darfur. To be fair, that controversial declaration of General Martin Luther Agwai was accompanied by a host of caveats and claims that were largely ignored by the reactive outcry that followed. After a few weeks, people calmed down and now Agwai’s best known accomplishment is in managing to stir up a semantics debate and pat himself on the back, all while trivializing the rampant insecurity that continues to afflict the region.
But yesterday, in response to a UN report that portrays Darfur as a still troubled place, Sudan’s Ambassador Abdalmahmoud Abdalhaleem echoed the former UNAMID commander’s remarks. Criticizing the report for leaving out the essential detail “that the war is over”, he recommended the UN start planning for its departure.
Before UNAMID begins packing up its things—many of which, ironically, have yet to arrive—perhaps it’s time to look again. Abdalhaleem suggests that by omitting the claim that war is over in Darfur, UN officials are using the report to preserve the relevance its mission no longer has. However, what the report actually reveals is that representatives of the beleaguered force were never in a position to make that claim to begin with…..for one very disturbing reason: access to any sustaining evidence has been consistently denied.
Agwai’s initial declaration was based on the absence of large-scale military activities, the weakness of rebel movements, and his own perception that the only immediate threat is banditry. Around the same time, outgoing Joint Special Representative Rodolphe Adada proclaimed his own accomplishments resulted in the end of civilian massacres in Darfur.
SOCIAL NETWORKING
Find us online and connect!
Find us online and connect!