Posts Tagged genocide

Bookmark and Share

‘Butcher of Srebrenica’ Arrested Day after Rwanda Genocide Mastermind

Thursday, May 26th, 2011

Ratko Mladic. AFP/Getty Images.

International justice gained two big wins in the past day with the separate arrests of indicted war criminals Ratko Mladic and Bernard Munyagishari.

Mladic is the former top Serbian military general who personally oversaw the mass execution of some 8,000 Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica.  Munyagishari is the former President of the Interahamwe, accused of orchestrating mass killings and rapes as one of the masterminds behind Rwanda’s 1994 genocide that resulted in the deaths of 800,000 people.

Bernard Munyagishari

Mladic, known as the butcher of Srebrenica, was captured in Serbia amid growing pressure for the country to do more to arrest him as a pre-condition to membership in the European Union.  He was the most wanted war criminal in Europe and will be extradited to the UN war crimes tribunal in the Hague.  Munyagishari was captured in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and had been featured in the U.S. State Department’s Rewards for Justice program, with a reward of up to $5 million for his capture.

These arrests come two weeks after the completion of a trial finding former head of the Rwandan army, Augustin Bizumungu, guilty of genocide and three weeks after the prosecutor at the International Criminal Court requested arrest warrants for Muammar Qaddafi and two other Libyan leaders for crimes against humanity.

In the wake of continued wars and state violence against civilians in countries like Libya, Syria, Sudan, and Yemen today, the arrests send a strong message that crimes perpetrated by political and military leaders will be met with accountability.

Bookmark and Share

May Policy Call on Current Crises

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

On May 12, SDC/GI-NET held a policy call to update people on the ongoing peace process in Darfur, the recent elections in South Kordofan, and the emerging crises in Libya and Syria. We also announced the launch of our new policy paper, “No Rush to Reward Khartoum”.

Update on Darfur: The situation in Darfur continues to show little improvement over the last couple of years. Following recent protests throughout Darfur, the Sudanese government arrested  activists and oppressed those voicing their opinions. The peace talks in Doha are rapidly evolving. On April 27, U.N./A.U. mediators gave their final version of a peace agreement to government and rebel groups. However, it has turned into a problematic document due to the fact that it does not cover everything negotiated.  Increasingly, it looks like this will not be a final version, and more negotiations will be necessary, pushing back the original May 23 deadline. Also postponed is the civil society conference, originally slated to take place this week. The leading mediator, Gabriel Basole, may leave the talks soon to become foreign minister of his home country Burkina Faso. Appointing a new mediator who is approved by the U.N. and A.U. will be essential.

Elections in South Kordofan. Source: AFP

South Kordofan Elections: The vote counting process for the state elections recently held in South Kordofan is currently underway. Although it is too soon to determine if the vote can be considered free and fair, S.P.L.M. has already walked out of the vote counting process. The outcome of these elections will be a key marker for whether the North and South are taking implementation of the C.P.A. seriously.

Post-call update: The National Congress Party (N.C.P.) candidate and incumbent, Ahmed Haroun, won the gubernatorial seat in Southern Kordofan’s elections according to the National Elections Commission (N.E.C.). He won the governorship with 201,455 votes, while the S.P.L.M. candidate, Abdel Aziz Al-Hilu, earned 194,955 votes. Last Friday the S.P.L.M. and Al-Hilu pulled out of the hotly contested election, claiming the vote was rigged.

South Sudan Independence: Independence for South Sudan is on schedule for July 9. SDC/GI-NET is concerned that the United States may give incentives to the Sudanese government too soon.  We are pushing for no incentives until the Sudanese government is held accountable and demonstrates its commitment to peace.

Colonel Gaddafi

Libya: Recent weeks have seen an increase in rebel capacity and there is still heavy fighting in and around Misrata. Conflict in Libya continues to be a threat to civilians.

Post-call update: The I.C.C. has requested arrest warrants for Colonel Gaddafi, his son Saif al-Islam, and the head of Libya’s intelligence service, Abdullah al-Senussi on crimes against humanity.

 

Syria: SDC/GI-NET has been following the cycle of violent oppression that has been taking place in Syria for over a month. Recently there has been an increase in the targeting for civilians which is of great concern. We have issued a press statement and will continue to follow the situation.

 

If you missed the call, listen here to find out all the details.

Bookmark and Share

Blogging to Prevent Genocide

Friday, April 22nd, 2011

For the dead and the living, we must bear witness. For not only are we responsible for the memories of the dead, we are also responsible for what we are doing with those memories.

- Elie Wiesel, Holocaust Survivor

Bloggers across the nation are uniting to spread the word about genocide prevention.  While we often hear about horrific crises in Darfur, Bosnia and Rwanda, rarely do we hear about the important work that can keep these atrocities from happening in the first place.

Please help us prevent genocide by writing your own blog with the resources below.  Through our blogs, we hope to educate communities on upcoming genocide prevention efforts in Congress. Despite its commitment to end atrocities, the U.S. government often fails to protect civilians during crises such as those in Rwanda and Darfur. These missed opportunities to save lives demonstrate that the United States does not have the right tools, structures and resources to effectively prevent atrocities.

YouTube Preview Image

To address this shortfall, Congress will consider legislation to improve early warning systems, reinforce cooperation between government agencies, and authorize flexible funding that enables a timely civilian response.  In order for their efforts to succeed, however, we need your help to ensure that your Senators and Representatives turn this important bill into law.

Please join our genocide prevention efforts and write a blog article that asks your readers to join as well.

You can use our short video and the talking points and petition link below to explain genocide prevention.  The links and organizations in the ‘Survivor Stories’ section will help you find survivor testimonials that demonstrate why this legislation is so important.  Or use your own creativity, insight, and passion to promote the fight against genocide.  Whichever you choose, please share your work with us!


Ask Your Readers to Take Action:

Encourage your readers to sign the petition at the link below.  The petition calls on the U.S. Congress to support efforts toward a genocide prevention bill.

Petition Link: https://secure3.convio.net/sdc/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=657


Use Talking Points to Explain Genocide Prevention:

  • Years of underinvestment in civilian tools like diplomacy, development, and international cooperation have crippled the U.S.’ ability to help prevent atrocities across the world.
  • In December 2010, the Senate passed a resolution (S. Con. Res. 71) calling for specific steps to improve US capacities to prevent genocide and atrocities.
  • The Obama administration has stated US commitment to prevention of genocide and mass atrocities in the National Security Strategy, Quadrennial Defense Review, and Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review. Yet, the practical policy steps needed to transform these words into action and ensure sustainable policy change are not yet being taken.
  • Leadership and pressure from Congress is needed now to ensure that the policy gaps and capacities in the US government are filled and maintained beyond any one administration.
  • The 112th Congress should prioritize genocide prevention by introducing bipartisan legislation that would strengthen US civilian capacities to detect potential atrocities, rebuild the diplomatic corps, improve the methods of delivering development assistance, use security assistance to protect civilians, and improve international cooperation.
  • Twenty-five years after Senate ratification of the Genocide Convention, its time for Congress to take the lead again in making the promise of “Never again” can a reality.


Make Your Work Resonate with Survivor Stories

Written testimonials:

Organizations with access to survivors:

Bookmark and Share

Mark Hanis: Marking liberation from Auschwitz

Thursday, January 27th, 2011

Reposted from Politico:

By MICHAEL ABRAMOWITZ & MARK HANIS

Today marks the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, the largest Nazi death camp. The United Nations designated this date International Holocaust Remembrance Day to honor the memory of those killed during the Holocaust and to rededicate ourselves to doing all we can to prevent such horrible crimes from happening again.

Given the bloody history of the past five decades — in Cambodia, Rwanda, the Balkans, Darfur and other places — a healthy degree of skepticism is warranted about politicians’ commitment to the lofty goal of “never again.” However, we believe that progress is discernible. Efforts by the United Nations and among member states to make genocide prevention a priority, coupled with a new focus by government officials and civil society on keeping political crises from metastasizing into massive violence against civilians, offer hope that a world without genocide is attainable.

Nearly 17 years ago, the United Nations looked the other way as genocide unfolded in Rwanda. So it was more than a little noteworthy last week when two senior U.N. officials, charged with monitoring for the threat of such grave crimes, bluntly warned about “the possibility of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and ethnic cleansing” in the Ivory Coast.

The Security Council has reinforced the U.N. peacekeeping force in the country, and numerous governments in Africa and elsewhere are pressing Laurent Gbagbo to step down after the internationally recognized victory of opposition leader Alassane Ouattara in November’s election.

In Sudan, a referendum likely to result in partition of the country later this year proceeded relatively peacefully, following an intense diplomatic push by the United States and other countries. Only six months ago, there were serious questions about whether the referendum would occur on time, and many feared a return to the sweeping violence, even genocide, that has plagued Africa’s largest country since its independence in 1956.

Severe dangers remain in both the Ivory Coast and Sudan — particularly in the long-troubled Darfur region, where violence has surged in recent months. However, there is reason to hope that governments around the world are finally getting the message that investing to prevent mass atrocities is not only sound humanitarian policy but also far more cost effective — avoiding huge costs of handling refugees, reconstruction and other requirements that inevitably follow genocide. Genocidal states also are invariably failed states, which incubate terrorism, pandemic diseases and other scourges.

Just last year, the United Nations reaffirmed its commitment to a “Responsibility to Protect,” making clear that its members are willing to step in to protect civilians from genocide, ethnic cleansing and other atrocities when countries are unwilling or unable to do so. New U.N. offices on RtoP and Genocide Prevention are working to shine a light on situations where these crimes are occurring or likely to occur.

The Obama administration has appointed, for the first time, a White House director of war crimes and atrocities at the National Security Council and established an interagency prevention committee to address potential threats of genocide and mass atrocities.

Congress also has taken some tentative steps toward endorsing genocide prevention as a matter of policy. On the last day of its recent session, the Senate passed a resolution that recognizes the U.S. national interest in “helping to prevent and mitigate acts of genocide and other mass atrocities against civilians and supporting and encouraging efforts to develop a whole government approach to prevent and mitigate such acts.”

As important as these steps taken by Washington is the continued growth of a vibrant and vocal constituency of citizens and nongovernmental organizations committed to the abolition of genocide and other mass atrocities. Governments everywhere are on notice that they risk public opprobrium and embarrassment if they fail to respond effectively to the kind of killing that took place in Rwanda or Darfur.

Despite these gains, considerable work remains. Much of this agenda was laid out in the December 2008 report by the Genocide Prevention Task Force, co-chaired by Madeleine Albright and William Cohen. The report recommends an array of measures aimed at strengthening government capacity to prevent mass atrocities.

Some of the recommendations have been adopted, but many have not — including a strong presidential statement of policy on preventing genocide, the creation of an international atrocities prevention network and greater funding for crisis prevention in countries at risk.

This must be accompanied by continued efforts to build a permanent anti-genocide constituency around the world that will hold all governments accountable for turning “never again” into a reality. This task requires organization and massive public education about the moral, financial and national security costs of genocide.

Achieving this goal would be a worthy accomplishment to celebrate on another International Holocaust Remembrance Day.

Michael Abramowitz is director of the Committee on Conscience, the genocide prevention initiative of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. Mark Hanis is co-founder and president of the newly merged Genocide Intervention Network / Save Darfur Coalition.

Bookmark and Share

UN Provides Transportation to Key Perpetrator of Darfur Genocide

Thursday, January 13th, 2011

Ahmed Haroun

Ahmed Haroun

Earlier this week the United Nations Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) provided helicopter transportation for the Governor of South Kordofan, Ahmed Haroun, to participate in talks to address recent violence in Abyei. While UN support of local authorities would not normally be an issue, Ahmed Haroun is not just a local official; he is also one of the primary orchestrators of the genocide in Darfur and is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for 51 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Prior to his term as governor, Haroun served as Minister of the State for the Interior,  coordinating attacks carried out by the Sudanese Armed Forces, National Intelligence and Security Services, and janjaweed militias that killed, raped, and forcibly displaced millions of Darfuri civilians.

In a briefing on Tuesday at the United Nations, the Spokesperson for Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, Martin Nesirky, stated that the helicopter transport of Haroun by UNMIS was “…critical to bringing the Missiriya leaders in Southern Kordofan to a peace meeting in Abyei to stop further clashes and killings.” Nesirky also added that “the UN Mission is mandated to provide good offices to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) parties in their efforts to resolve their differences through dialogue and negotiations. UNMIS has been working with the parties, including the local authorities, to contain any potential violence which may escalate.”

While the participation of local officials, such as Haroun, can be necessary to prevent violence, the UN and the international community should distance themselves from criminals who have committed egregious acts such as war crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide. If the attendance of Haroun is absolutely essential, the Government of Sudan should provide the transportation, not the United Nations. What is even more nonsensical is that the UN Security Council referred the situation in Darfur to the ICC, which in turn led to the warrant for the arrest of Haroun; therefore one would think they would at least be on the same page. By providing support to perpetrators of mass atrocities wanted by the ICC, the United Nations is undermining the effectiveness of the court and setting a dangerous precedent to other actors in Sudan.

Bookmark and Share

Balance Optimism with Caution

Wednesday, January 12th, 2011

Smiling Girl / Burnt Village
On Monday, Maggie Fick had an important piece in ForeignPolicy.com about the “danger in celebrating too early.” While we are pleased to see that — thus far — the referendum voting process has gone off without significant complications, there are still “difficult negotiations and thorny details” to be resolved before Southern Sudan becomes independent.  As Maggie writes:

That leaves just a few months for some of the most contentious issues in Sudan’s recent history to be resolved. The parties will have to decide who becomes a citizen, a tricky question since tens of thousands of southerners now live in the north. A security arrangement along the border will have to be worked out — as will the actual border demarcation itself. It’s also not clear yet how north and south Sudan will share oil wealth, much of which will be concentrated in the new independent state. But perhaps most controversial of all is the status of Abyei, which lies along the disputed border…

There is a good chance that the negotiations will move too slowly to meet the July deadline. Insider accounts of the AU-brokered talks suggest that Khartoum is intentionally stalling. Moderator and former South African President Thabo Mbeki has reportedly chided Khartoum on at least one occasion for what appears to be a lack of seriousness in the negotiations…

And what happens if the deadline isn’t met at all? No matter where the talks stand in July, Southern Sudan is likely to move forward with its claim for independence. And that, many fear, could escalate in the worst-case scenario into a new north-south war.

Senator John Kerry was deeply engaged on Sudan issues in the run-up to the referendum. Over the weekend he made helpful statements about the need for international actors to fully engage on a Darfur peace process, but his comments at a press event on Monday in Khartoum strike me as potentially problematic.  First, Senator Kerry overstated the commitments President Bashir’s regime has made:

And the leaders in the North have made it clear by embracing this referendum, and in President Bashir’s visit here just a few days ago he made it clear, that they are prepared to embrace and recognize the results and, no matter what, help to build this new future.

As Maggie makes clear, even if Khartoum “accepts” the referendum, it can take other measures to impede a peaceful divorce. Ample evidence suggests this is a real possibility.

Senator Kerry went on to say that remaining issues—including “the resolution of Darfur”—could be dealt with “over the course of the next weeks and months.” This seems unrealistically optimistic. A peace agreement addressing the fundamental issues for Darfur needs to be negotiated, with civil society participation, and implemented in order to achieve a “resolution of Darfur.”

Urgency is welcome. Hurried efforts to find quick fixes would be a mistake. Checking the boxes in a minimalist way to justify normalizing relations between the United States and Sudan would be counterproductive. While recognizing the need to make incentives credible, a rush to reward Khartoum at this time is unwarranted. If the international community needs a reminder of this, it should look no further than Darfur where 32,000 civilians were newly displaced by fighting in December. It’s particularly important that Senator Kerry, as Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, be willing to push back against the Administration if it seeks to give carrots before durable progress is made on the key issues.

Bookmark and Share

Hearing Provides Opportunity to Address Intersection of Business and Human Rights

Wednesday, December 29th, 2010

On November 30th, the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee’s Subcommittee on International Monetary Policy and Trade held a hearing titled “Investments Tied to Genocide: Sudan Divestment and Beyond.”  During the hearing, the subcommittee expressed interest in evaluating the effectiveness of the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act (SADA) of 2007 and seeing what lessons from the Sudan movement could potentially be applied to help respond to genocide more broadly.

The hearing featured testimony from Thomas Melito the Director of International Affairs and Trade for the Government Accountability Office, Eric Cohen the Chairperson of Investors Against Genocide, Adam Kanzer the Managing Director and General Counsel for Domini Social Investments LLC, and Ambassador Richard Williamson the former U.S. Special Envoy to Sudan.

Members of Congress in attendance included Subcommittee Chairman Gregory Meeks (D-NY), Subcommittee Ranking Member Gary Miller (R-CA), Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA), Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) and Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-MN).

Applying Lessons-Learned from the Sudan Movement

We are proud to note that Genocide Intervention Network (GI-NET)—through the Sudan Divestment Task Force (SDTF)—served as the clearinghouse for the Sudan divestment movement.  Moreover, the work of GI-NET and Save Darfur was critical to ensuring the successful passage of SADA.

We greatly appreciate the subcommittee’s work to pull together the hearing, their interest in wanting to improve the effectiveness of SADA and their desire to take action in response to future instances of genocide and mass atrocities.  To this end, we would like to note a few critical elements of the GI-NET/Save Darfur experience and propose recommendations for the subcommittee’s consideration moving forward.

Background on the Sudan Divestment Movement

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signs the state's divestment bill into law in September 2006.

When the Sudan Divestment Task Force (SDTF) was founded in 2006 there was a significant gap in information on which companies were operating on the ground in Sudan.  There was also limited policy expertise on how to most effectively approach companies working in an area where the United States Government had declared genocide was taking place.  In order to fill these gaps, SDTF conducted and maintained extensive research into which industries were problematic in Sudan and further determined which companies served a problematic role within those industries.  This research has been compiled into quarterly reports that are still continuously updated today.  Specific to policy, SDTF learned early on that problematic corporate behavior could in some cases be addressed through engagement, and that divestment could be an effective tool if used as a last resort after engagement was attempted. The emphasis on engagement over blanket divestment was a cornerstone of the movement and one of the reasons the policy has been successful.

(more…)

Bookmark and Share

International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women

Wednesday, November 24th, 2010

This Thursday is the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women. While we celebrate all that we are thankful for, women and girls in Darfur continue to be targets of sexual and gender based violence. Over the past decade, rape has been used as a tool of war by the Sudan armed forces, allied militias and other belligerents in Darfur to terrorize women and their communities. Today, Darfuri women and girls are increasingly targets of opportunistic violence that flourishes in Darfur’s environment of widespread insecurity, continuing violent clashes, and near total impunity.

Women from Kalma IDP camp in Darfur

During the height of direct attacks on villages by the Sudan Armed Forces and allied janjaweed militias, women and girls were often specifically targeted with brutal sexual violence. In a report by Amnesty International, a Darfuri woman recounted her horrific experience:

“When we tried to escape they shot more children. They raped women; I saw many cases of Janjawid raping women and girls. They are happy when they rape. They sing when they rape and they tell that we are just slaves and that they can do with us how they wish.”

Such mass targeting of women and girls is not about sexual desire; it is fundamentally about control and power. Sexual and gender based violence is often intended not only to physically injure women, but also to humiliate and emotionally scar women and their families and communities.

Currently most incidents of sexual and gender based violence are concentrated on the outskirts of camps for internally displaced persons (IDPs), where 1 out every 3 Darfuri civilians have fled to seek refuge from violence. With continued restrictions on its movement and operations, UNAMID has been unable to provide full security in areas around IDP camps. Women face an especially high risk for sexual and gender based violence whenever they travel outside camps, which they often must do to gather firewood, plant crops, or collect water. The Sudanese government also severely restricts the ability of humanitarian organizations to provide medical and psychosocial services that would assist survivors of sexual violence.

The perpetrators of rape and other forms of violence against women do so with near total impunity. Rape and other forms of violence against women often go unreported since women who admit to being attacked face harassment and their claims are often dismissed by authorities. Women also often fear the social stigma that can surround sexual violence – at worst, victims who admit attacks can be shunned by their husbands or families.

In the parts of Sudan where Sharia law is practiced, rape is defined as the offense of zina — intercourse between unmarried men and women – that is performed without consent.  If a woman is unable to prove she did not consent, she is at risk of being charged with zina for having confessed to sexual intercourse outside of marriage. To prosecute a man for rape, Sudanese courts often require to the sexual act to have been witnessed by four men – making such prosecutions nearly impossible. Under Sudan’s Sharia law, unmarried women who are convicted of zina receive 100 lashes, and married women risk being sentenced to death by stoning. All of these factors make the reporting of sexual and gender based crimes, let alone prosecuting them, very rare.

The international community must do more to prevent and respond to violence against women in Dafur. To reduce the level of sexual and gender based violence in Darfur, the social stigma against victims must be overcome.  While the Joint UN/AU Peacekeeping Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) has conducted several training exercises aimed at reducing the social stigma of sexual violence, these must be expanded throughout the region. UNAMID can also reduce the possibility of violence against women occurring by increasing patrols surrounding IDP camps, in consultation with IDP women about when and where patrols would be most beneficial. The international community should also promote women’s leadership in Sudanese civil society and Darfuri women’s full participation in the Darfur peace negotiations. Any lasting peace must be crafted with the full inclusion of civil society stakeholders, including women.

As we celebrate with family and friends this Thanksgiving, the crisis in Darfur and grave challenges faced by women in Sudan will continue. The current environment of impunity for sexual and gender-based violence and other atrocities cannot be tolerated. On Thursday, we should not only give thanks, but renew our commitment to advocacy to protect and empower women across Sudan.

Bookmark and Share

Reviewing Presidential Candidate Barack Obama’s 2008 Plan for Darfur

Friday, November 12th, 2010

Photo by Martha Bixby

“Obama believes this is America’s moment to confront the crisis and lead the way toward an end to this four year-old genocide.” – Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign plan for Darfur

Time and time again, President Obama has stated his commitment to ending the crisis in Darfur. As a U.S. Senator, he visited a camp near the border between Sudan and Chad in 2006 to meet with Darfuri refugees. As a presidential candidate in 2008, he and fellow candidates Senators Hillary Clinton and John McCain released a joint statement on the ongoing atrocities in Darfur. They promised,

“If peace and security for the people of Sudan are not in place when one of us is inaugurated as President on January 20, 2009, we pledge that the next Administration will pursue these goals with unstinting resolve.”

While going through old files in preparation for welcoming the staff of Genocide Intervention Network to the Save Darfur offices, an SDC staffer came across Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign plan for ending the conflict in Darfur. On January 20, 2009, Barack Obama assumed the presidency and the powers that office would accord to him. So how has President Obama done with respect to the goals for Darfur he set for himself as a presidential candidate?

Presidential Candidate Barack Obama’s 2008 Plan for Darfur:

  • Deploy an International Force: “deploy a large, capable UN-led and UN-funded force with a robust mandate to stop the killings”
    • Is UNAMID “capable”? UNAMID has been the international peacekeeping force in charge of protecting civilians in Darfur since taking over operations in Darfur for the African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS) in 2007. Despite its mandates to protect Darfuris as well as protect the administration of humanitarian support, there have been reports of the Government of Sudan impeding its work which has compromised the force’s ability to fulfill its obligations and attacks on unprotected civilians continue.
  • Pressure the Khartoum Regime: “there are immediate economic, military and covert steps the U.S., the international community, and our allies in Africa must take to show Khartoum that we will not tolerate continued genocide”
    • What steps has he taken to show Khartoum he will not tolerate genocide? Most recently, President Obama sent Massachusetts Senator John Kerry to Sudan to meet with government officials to offer to take Sudan off of state terrorist list early, by July 2011, if referendum on Southern secession goes ahead. However, this offer (which has been rejected by members of the National Congress Party) is not directly tied to the Government of Sudan’s performance in Darfur. Instead, the Obama administration has made the lifting of economic sanctions and normalization of diplomatic relations contingent on progress in establishing peace in Darfur, as well as on holding the referendum.
  • Implement More Effective Sanctions
  • Provide Humanitarian Aid
  • Implement a No-Fly Zone: to protect civilians in Darfur & to put pressure on the Government of Sudan

“And even as we focus on advancing peace between north and south, we will not abandon the people of Darfur… [N]ow is the moment for all nations to send a strong signal that there will be no time and no tolerance for spoilers who refuse to engage in peace talks. Indeed, there can be no lasting peace in Darfur — and no normalization of relations between Sudan and the United States — without accountability for crimes that have been committed.  Accountability is essential not only for Sudan’s future, it also sends a powerful message about the responsibilities of all nations that certain behavior is simply not acceptable in this world; that genocide is not acceptable.”

President Obama needs to keep Darfur on his radar as his administration prepares to deal with the aftermath of the referendum on southern secession, whether the vote goes on as scheduled and is free and fair, or not. The U.S. should appoint a high-level diplomat to deal exclusively with the crisis in Darfur and use its upcoming U.N. Security Council presidency to keep member states’ attention on Sudan, and Darfur in particular.

Bookmark and Share

Civilians Still Under Attack in Darfur

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

Last Monday, humanitarian organizations were given access to the Jebel Marra region of Darfur for the first time in 6 months, with the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) being allowed in to deliver food and medical supplies. However, it doesn’t appear that much has changed in the war torn region since several attacks against villages in Jebel Marra have been reported over the past week. According to the Luis Moreno-Ocampo, Prosecutor for the International Criminal Court, over 100,000 civilians have been “forcibly displaced by Sudanese armed forces in the Jebel Marra”.

Burning Village in Darfur

The region has been cut off due to fighting between the rebel Sudanese Liberation Movement-Abdul Wahid (SLA-AW) faction and the government controlled Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) that erupted in February. Jebel Marra has been stronghold of the SLA-AW, one of the primary groups that initially rebelled against the Government of Sudan (GoS) in 2003, and has continued to refuse to participate in the Darfur peace talks held in Doha. Aid organizations were forced to leave after escalating violence and threats made it impossible for them to operate, leaving civilians who depended on humanitarian assistance in a critical position.

Within the same week that the government allowed humanitarian groups back into the region, Sudanese newspapers reported that the government used Antonov bombers to attack several villages in Jebel Marra on September 22nd and 23rd, killing 18 people including women and children. The attack was not an isolated incident and as Radio Dabanga reported, aerial bombardments against villages in Jebel Marra have continued. Darfuri civilians on the ground have stated that in this latest attack government troops burned 14 villages, resulting in the deaths of 57 civilians and displacement of over 5000 Darfuris.  Earlier this month over 58 civilians were killed and another 86 were injured in an attack on Tabra, a town near El-Fasher in Northern Darfur.

These incidents demonstrate that violence against civilians in Darfur is still ongoing. With the referendum on Southern Sudanese independence fast approaching, civilian protection must remain the key focus for the international community. The Government of Sudan cannot be allowed to take advantage of the shift of attention to the referendum to target Darfuri civilians.

Donate Now to the Save Darfur Coalition

Twitter Feed

 Subscribe in a reader