Media Archive

Bookmark and Share

The President’s Crucial Decision on Sudan

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

In response to potential changes in President Obama’s Sudan policy, Sudan Now, a campaign led by a group of prominent anti-genocide and human rights advocacy organizations, is running ads in The New York Times and the Vineyard Gazette to influence the president’s decision, expected soon, on the future direction of U.S. Sudan policy.

The president faces a critical decision on how to move forward on Sudan–including one that may result in a severe shift in approach in U.S. policy nearly 100 days before the referendum vote that could divide Africa’s largest country.

Additionally, a letter signed by 68 organizations is being sent to the president on the same topic. Both the ads and the letter advocate for a balanced Sudan policy that includes both incentives and pressures.

You can join the call for a robust, balanced Sudan policy by taking action today.

Please spread the word:

Tweet This:

Tell @BarackObama to make the right choice for #SudanNow. http://tinyurl.com/2a3wh6w @WhiteHouse

Share on Facebook:

Visit the White House Facebook Page and post: “Mr. President, please make the right decision on Sudan. Act on Sudan Now. www.SudanActionNow.com” or a message of your own.

And, take a moment to watch the new video from Stop Genocide Now.

Bookmark and Share

Reading Roundup — July 13, 2010

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

The International Criminal Court’s decision to issue a second arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir created a flood of Sudan related news stories and punditry. The new warrant is a big deal, but it also led to a number of other important Sudan related issues falling below the radar. Here is a quick roundup of Sudan related news from the past couple of days:

Genocide Arrest Warrant For Bashir

Referendum on Southern Secession

Other Important Sudan Related News

Bookmark and Share

Reactions to the ICC’s Genocide Arrest Warrant for Omar al-Bashir

Monday, July 12th, 2010

Initial Word from the ICC:

The news broke online when the ICC issued a press release announcing its second arrest warrant against Omar al-Bashir, this time for three counts of genocide:

“[T]here are reasonable grounds to believe [Omar al-Bashir] responsible for three counts of genocide committed against the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa ethnic groups, that include: genocide by killing, genocide by causing serious bodily or mental harm and genocide by deliberately inflicting on each target group conditions of life calculated to bring about the group’s physical destruction.”

Media Coverage:

After the ICC issued its press release, BBC News was among the first of the primary media outlets to report the story online. Traffic from those who took an early interest in the story made it one of the most frequently tweeted and posted internet sources for people looking for the essential information on Monday morning.

The Associated Press was also a frequently referenced information source among tweeters, bloggers, and Facebook users who wanted to spread the word about the warrant. In this article, AP reporter Mike Corder calls the three charges against al-Bashir “a move that will pile further diplomatic pressure on his isolated regime” and noted that this is the first time the ICC has issued charges of genocide.

CNN added commentary on the AU’s reaction to ICC charges against al-Bashir:

“The African Union this year urged the court to delay war crimes proceedings against Sudan’s president, saying a decision allowing genocide charges harms peace efforts. ‘The African Union has always emphasized its commitment to justice and its total rejection of impunity,’ it said in a statement in February. ‘At the same time, the AU reiterates that the search for justice should be pursued in a manner not detrimental to the search for peace. The latest decision by the ICC (International Criminal Court) runs in the opposite direction.’”

Reuters released a piece with statements from Sudanese officials later in the day:

“Bashir says the allegations made by the ICC, the world’s first permanent court for prosecuting war crimes, are part of a Western conspiracy. The ICC warrant was the first issued against a sitting head of state by the court.

Abdalmahmoud Abdalhaleem, Sudan’s ambassador to the United Nations, called the new arrest warrant a ‘malignant and desperate attempt’ to destabilize the country.

‘We condemn this move in strongest terms and we are confident that the Sudanese people and all peaceloving nations will ensure the demise of this criminal institution,’ Abdalhaleem said in a statement, referring to the ICC.”

(more…)

Bookmark and Share

ACJPS Condemns Sudanese Censorship

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

The African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies just sent out the following release condemning the Sudanese Government’s recent crackdown on political opposition and the press:

Sudanese Authorities Renew Use of Pre-Print Censorship to Suppress Political Opinion

Contact: Osman Hummaida, Executive Director
Phone: +44 7956095738
E-mail: osman@acjps.org

(20 May 2010) In the evening of Wednesday, 19 May, three National Intelligence and Security Services (NISS) officers visited the offices of the newspaper Ajras Alhurria, which is perceived as aligned with the SPLM. The officers demanded to see the following day’s edition.

The officers ordered that six out of 12 of the pages of the newspaper be deleted. This material included regular columns, general news, and opinion pieces. Ajras Alhurria could not publish a newspaper on Thursday as so much content had been removed. After their tour of Ajras Alhurria’s offices, they similarly censored Alsahafa and Al Sudani newspapers prior to the publication of Thursday’s edition. At Alsahafa, NISS agents demanded to see editorial material and opinion columns. Its editor, Al-Nur Ahmed Al-Nur, stated that the censorship constituted “a step backwards in the democratic transformation of the country”.

(more…)

Bookmark and Share

Great Letter to the Editor in the Tennessean

Monday, January 4th, 2010

Today, on the first Monday of 2010, The Tennessean (the second largest newspaper in Tennessee) printed a Letter to the Editor by14-year old Jessica Goldstein from Brentwood, TN entitled Let’s reaffirm our Darfur commitment. Take a look:

When we enter a new year, we tend to reflect on our gains and our losses from the previous year. In 2009, we accomplished much, but many factors have caused us to forget one very important issue that our country has passed by for many years now: Darfur. After almost seven years, genocide still continues to threaten the very existence of those in Darfur and all of Sudan.

Since 2003, an estimated 300,000 have perished in this violence and 2.7 million have been displaced or forced to leave their homes. This genocide is seen as the most atrocious humanitarian crisis occurring today. The U.S. called this murder, rape and torture genocide in 2004, yet our country hasn’t learned that actions speak louder than words.

As Holocaust survivor and novelist Elie Wiesel stated, “I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” And Martin Luther King Jr. said, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

With the upcoming election in Sudan, there is little time to wait. We all need to begin this new year and the new decade fighting for the rights of those only allowed to whisper. With our strong words and strong actions, our voices scream. Let us honestly be able to say, “Never again.”

Thanks, Jessica! It is advocates like you that keep Darfur and Sudan in the media and on the minds of newsmakers and policy leaders.

Bookmark and Share

Al Jazeera’s “Inside Story” On Sudan’s North/South Conflict

Friday, December 18th, 2009

Last week, Al Jazeera’s “Inside Story” examined the recent violence in Khartoum and the conflict between the ruling National Congress Party (NCP) and the Sudanese People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM). The segment, Sudan’s North/South rivals collide, features a brief news report and a panel discussion/debate about weather or not Sudan’s elections can take place on time without a reform to the electoral laws. Take a look:


Bookmark and Share

U.S. Policy on Sudan on VOA’s In Focus

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Amir Osman, Senior Director of Policy and Government Relations for the Save Darfur Coaltion, appeared on Voice of America’s In Focus to discuss the recently released Sudanese Policy Review:


Learn more about the Sudan Policy Review

Bookmark and Share

More Than A Bumper Sticker

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Today’s Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal entitled “Obama and Darfur” misses the mark and perpetuates an unfortunate stereotype that we’re a partisan movement that was eager to criticize the Bush administration but reticent to do the same to President Obama.

The Journal writes that “the larger wonder is how [Monday's release of the policy review] can go down so smoothly with those in the human rights community who have championed Darfur and assailed the Bush administration for not doing enough.  Instead, they are congratulating President Obama…”

Anyone who read our public response to the strategy release, as well as my blog post later that day would be clear on the fact that we did not congratulate the Obama administration.  We were, without a doubt, pleased that the strategy review was finally completed and that it called for a balanced set of incentives and pressures to be used with the Government of Sudan.  We had been calling for such a plan for months (and over 100,000 activists asked President Obama to take up our plan).  Our brief criticism of the Bush Administration for pursuing normalization of relations with Sudan was due solely to a remark by then-Special Envoy Rich Williamson that the United States that led people to believe that the U.S. would be giving up that leverage without getting anything in return.  To his credit, Williamson clarified his remarks during a hearing before Congress that the United States was not considering any such plan, and that normalization would only be considered if Khartoum fulfilled its commitments.

We were not then, nor are we now, against holding out the promise of engagement for the regime in Khartoum.  If that is the best way to end the conflict in Darfur, fully implement the CPA, and ensure justice is done, then so be it.  What we have consistently been against is normalization for nothing.  The Sudan policy document states clearly that “assessments of progress and decisions regarding incentives and disincentives must…be based on verifiable changes in conditions on the ground.”

(more…)

Bookmark and Share

Jerry Fowler Discusses the Sudan Policy Review in CNN’s Situation Room

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

Bookmark and Share

Ambassador Rice to appear on Meet the Press

Friday, October 2nd, 2009
Ambassador Susan Rice

Ambassador Susan Rice

This Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice is doing an interview on Meet the Press.

This is a great opportunity to ask one of the President’s top advisers about important issues relating to Sudan. You can suggest questions for Ambassador Rice by emailing MTP or via twitter to @meetthepress or to host @davidgregory.

It is best if the questions are in your own words, but feel free to use or adapt these suggested questions:

1) Dr. Rice, this week the Washington Post published two articles that were of grave concern to the Darfur advocacy community.  The first article implied that the President’s Special Envoy favors normalization talks with the Government of Sudan and is not recognizing Khartoum’s past bad behavior.  How do you explain Special Envoy Gration’s remarks? What is the administration’s policy on Sudan?

2) The second article indicated that former Reagan administration staffer Bud McFarlane may be working to lobby government officials on behalf of the Sudanese government.  The White House acknowledged that both General Jones and Special Envoy Gration had spoken to Mr. McFarlane about Sudan. Can you tell us what kind of relationship the administration has with Mr. McFarlane and whether it is now reevaluating that relationship in light of the revelation that he may be receiving funds from the Sudanese government?

Donate Now to the Save Darfur Coalition

Twitter Feed

 Subscribe in a reader

.